tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911412858896623561.post7133186673052900670..comments2023-08-02T08:30:27.882-04:00Comments on LEGALEAZE: Legal Education, Guidance & Assistance for Layfolk: California Court of Appeals finds no emotional distress in vet's negligenceMz.Many Nameshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03024590325712635526noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2911412858896623561.post-25743217875029839872009-11-04T00:27:01.909-05:002009-11-04T00:27:01.909-05:00Thank you for a well written article on this case....Thank you for a well written article on this case. <br /><br />As for the CVMA and the "Pet Health Institute," Dr. Kent Mclue of PHI runs around the country fighting against non-economic damages with the same disingenuous argument. In my opinion, he is the Devil Incarnate, and an enemy of all pets and those who love them -- as are most of the veterinary lobby. He testified against pro-pet legislation I supported in Washington DC, and he and his cronies succeeded in gladhanding the city council till they stripped the provisions which would have established limited damages for the NEGLIGENT KILLING of a pet by a vet. <br /><br />These people need to be exposed and you are helping to do that, so thank you. <br /><br />Please see my blog, the http://badvetdaily.blogspot.com, and my website, The Toonces Project, http://www.TheTooncesProject.comStefanihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07239847432599114367noreply@blogger.com